ApoB / Lp(a) / Lipids
What is a CAC (calcium score) CT scan and should I get one?
A coronary artery calcium (CAC) score CT is a non-invasive low-radiation scan (equivalent to about 20 chest X-rays) that quantifies calcified plaque in the coronary arteries, producing a score (Agatston units) that directly measures the burden of atherosclerotic disease already present, with a score of 0 indicating extremely low cardiovascular event risk for the next 10–15 years, and a score above 100 indicating substantial plaque burden warranting aggressive cardiovascular risk management (Agatston et al., JACC, 199090282-T)).
The CAC score is the single most informative cardiovascular risk reclassification tool available in 2026, it tells you what is actually in your arteries, not what a population-level risk calculator predicts might be there based on your risk factors. For men aged 40–65 who are in intermediate cardiovascular risk (10-year risk of 7.5–20% by pooled cohort equation), a CAC score of 0 can reclassify them to low risk and avoid statin therapy; a score above 100 can reclassify them to high risk and confirm the need for therapy.
Honesty Scale: Solid (1) for CAC as the most informative cardiovascular risk reclassification tool in asymptomatic men.
What to do: Discuss CAC scoring with your cardiologist if you are 40–65 with any cardiovascular risk factors (family history, elevated ApoB, hypertension, smoking history, diabetes). The scan takes 11 minutes, typically costs $100–$200, and is not usually covered by insurance for primary prevention purposes, but provides more specific information than a decade of annual lipid panels.
For the full picture, read The ApoB/Lp(a)/Lipids Deep Dive
Deep Dive
For the full clinical picture: Read the full essay →
Start with the gap between how you appear and what your body is doing.
The Signal Check identifies the specific clinical territories that matter most for your cardiovascular risk profile.
Take the Signal CheckNext in ApoB / Lp(a) / Lipids
What is the real story on HDL — is high HDL actually protective? →